In the hope of cobbling together words that hopefully lead to a congruent discussion, I found myself at odds with the whole debacle surrounding the ‘doings’ of the deputy Health Minister, Nozizwe Madlala-Routledge. Said Deputy Minister knew very well what the consequences at play were, as anyone who has ever worked in a corporate environment can attest to; one can push the envelope but as long as one plays the game, all is fine.
As for her sacking, Ministers are appointed by the President and as such, if the President feels that a change is necessary, he will act accordingly; irrespective of how the public feels about it.
But the after-the-fact flinging of conspiracies at any available switched-on-mike, in the hope of canvassing public pity, is a well employed ploy. It is well understood that public opinion is short lived, thus the holding of regular press interviews and casually dropping clandestine sounding statements that, in essence, say a lot but carry no substance, deserves a nod of appreciation.
For the moment, public pity and Union cadres will carry her case far and wide, but as any media buff knows, it will all come to pass as new news takes centre stage. Point in question: the newly published inference that Minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang’s liver transplant could be due to her imbuement of the ‘good life.’
I for one do not care one way or another: its all part of the political game plan that we can only surmise to. All we can do is hope that, come next election, we chose wisely.
Ends
Whilst you claim it is all about "politics", did you stop to think of the state of our the nations hospitals? Have you been to one lately in the Eastern Cape? Did you stop to think what Joe Public thinks about this emotive issue?
Did you consider the family's whose newly born children are dying in these hospitals every day? Divide 200 a month by 30 and you get more than 6 of our children a day!
Whilst the deputy is clearly no shrinkin violet and has been stepping on toes along the way, she is seen by a lot of highly intelligent people and organisations as a breath of fresh air in the health system. The hospitals in South Africa are in dire straits [this is a well documented fact] and the Minister of Health and our president are responsible for the way in which our hospitals are managed. The buck stops with them.
The public are emotive about the deputy's sacking because she was seen to be doing something about a subject very close to all of our hearts, namely the health and care of the people of SA.
Your statement that you do not care one or another, it is just a political game is naive at best.
Give it some more thought and tell me that you do care if your child or family dies in a state run hospital due to ineptidiude? You clearly did not apply your mind to what you are writing.
Perhaps the deputy health minister justs cares more than you do?