myDigitalLife Blogs

Blogs about Digital, Lifestyle, current news and opinions

Great Video - must watch

Posted by: Dissol

Tagged in: COP17 , climate change

Dissol

I have been so busy in recent weeks, hardly been home in weeks.  Travelling both within & outside our borders, almost all work.  I was briefly in the UK, and was able to catch up with family & friends there, which I have not been able to do for over 3 years.  At least Skype means that I am no longer shocked with the aging process of family & friends.

Recent events have brought home some key thoughts.  Some nice & fuzzy, others stark & cold.  The nice & fuzzy are the ones around old friends; the people who you have not met for years, but the conversations pick up from wherever you left off.  The hugs last a little longer, as you cling to each other, realising it may be many years, or even the last time you are able to do that.

But the stark, cold ones happened closer to home.  Durban in fact.  I did not go to the COP17 conference, as I feared the worst.  Looks like I was right to be fearful.  The outcome is brilliantly summed up with this speech to the floor.  http://www.democracynow.org/2011/12/9/get_it_done_urging_climate_justice

I cannot embed the video for some reason, but I would urge you to go and listen to the speech given by Anjali Appadurai, a student at the College of the Atlantic in Maine, where she beratesthe conference on behalf of youth delegates.

Personally, I have no doubt at all, that future generations will look with absolute disgust at the present generation.  We are the ones abusing the planet, and messing it up for our offspring.  We were never going to get a real agreement in Durban, but the wishy washy result is really awful, for all of us.  It is a bit like a morbidly obese person, who has just been told by the doctors that he must start losing weight now, or there is an almost certainty that he will die in the next 5 years, saying, yes, I will promise to think about dieting, but only in 10 years time, until then I shall keep consuming at the same rate.

Of course, people could point their fingers at me, after my travelling, how can I comment?  Well, I have tried to embrace the issue, by looking at my own carbon footprint, and offsetting my carbon usage wherever possible.  It is still a choice though, and I realise that these issues have to be taken on at a global scale.

My solution is simple; we are using the wrong people to make the decisions.  Politicians only look at the short term future - they think to the next election cycle (maximum of around 5-6years).  These are the wrong people.  What we ought to do is to get all the governments to agree to send their scientists, and also agree to be bound by all decisions that the scientists come to at the conference.  As Anjali says: "The most stark betrayal of your generation’s responsibility to ours is that you call this "ambition".  Where is the courage in these rooms? Now is not the time for incremental action. In the long run, these will be seen as the defining moments of an era in which narrow self-interest prevailed over science, reason and common compassion."

Comments (7)Add Comment
Jawellnofine
...
written by Jawellnofine, December 12, 2011
Welcome back Dissol. You missed a good competition.

I battle to get caught up with the whole climate-change thingy: although the information at hand is quite fetching, the omissions just so e.g. what about the effect of all the volcanic eruption that takes places around the globe on a yearly basis?

Also, Anjali usues too many emotive aphorism for my liking. Yes I agree that a makeover is a must but using 'generation' infected words to elicit action does not do it for me (when one is born into a world without flowers, what point of reference is there for the inference - it will only be those that knew about flowers that will bemoan the loss; must like the older generation bemoaning the good-old-days?)

There are too many emotions running around without much consideration for effects of actions to be taken (a proclivity of the human being)e.g. sustainable employment!? What is the point of having a supposed 'clean' earth yet not have the money to enjoy its fruits?

There is just too much verbiage and minorities claiming to speak for masses.
the new james rond
...
written by the new james rond, December 13, 2011
Instead of giving us 5 years before the end of the world I have the following suggestion: For 5 years everyone in the developing world uses condoms religiously. No new babies for 5 years! Imagine that.
This emotional little girl representing 50% of the world population can be a bit more pro-active and start teaching people about birth control.
Jawellnofine
...
written by Jawellnofine, December 13, 2011
but that would be against the Human Rights Charter thus not contemplated.
Dissol
...
written by Dissol, December 13, 2011
@Jawellnofine, thanks for the welcome back. But I think you miss the point. There are really good reasons for the emotions, as we are systematically wrecking the earth. Sustainable employment will mean nothing, when we have boatloads of people trying to escape places like Bangladesh arriving on our shores. We would not be able to send them back, as there would be no where to send them back to. We are facing really catastrophic futures, and the politicians are burying their heads in the sands. They give too much time to the idiots who deny the facts. Climate change is happening. Most of the problems are man made. We have to act now...not just talk about possibly acting at some stage in the future. The world leaders have failed the world.
Jawellnofine
...
written by Jawellnofine, December 14, 2011
I do not see the situation that way. Climate change is a natural occurence that occurs every few thousand years. According to natgeo reports, the next change is way overdue.

What I don't see happening are frank discussion on what to do when the changes occur!?

All we will be doing is staving off the inevitable.

I disagree with your take on employment. If my stomach is empty would I care for the brouhaha? It is a catch 22 situation but self preservation comes first. The rest is emotional hogwash.



Dissol
...
written by Dissol, December 15, 2011
Yes, there is a natural cycle, but the difference this time is the man-made effect, which seems to be huge (anything from 70 - 90%), & this means that any effect will be more rapid & more dramatic. Any delay now will cost lives later. We will see more and more conflicts over water, we will see millions starving, and being displaced due to floods, droughts, and rising sea levels. Serious weather will become the norm, - storm damage, etc. Millions of stomachs will be empty.
Jawellnofine
...
written by Jawellnofine, December 15, 2011
sounds like a contradiction in terms but any ways, we will not see eye to eye on this one.

dealys will stave off the inevitable.


Add your 2Cents
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy

Member Login