There was a recent article containing the above pictures stating that this Iranian boy was being punished for stealing bread and that this was based on Shariah Law. Firstly they clearly do not know what Shariah law is about and if they had a clue on Islam itself, they would understand that children of this age are not punished for stealing food. What the writer failed to show is that WHERE in Shariah law this is found.
Now after much investigation and after seeing this I couldnt help but think of "street" performers because the child was not being held down, the male had a microphone, his arm was placed on a thick blanket, etc etc.....(knowledge, understanding and logic apply here).
It turns out that the original pictures were taken from a 2005 Iranian weblog on
peykeiran.com. They are credited to "Siamak Yari" The two-part article is no longer on line, but some sniffing around turned it up nevertheless (a good reminder that whatever one publishes on the Internet is potentially there forever!):
http://web.peykeiran.com/net_iran/irnewsbody.aspx?ID=22394 contained the first four pictures.
http://web.peykeiran.com/net_iran/irnewsbody.aspx?ID=22395 contained the last four pictures.
The second part contained three pictures that are omitted from the e-mail. These are those pictures:
Siamak Yari
Street magicians perform the well-known trick of driving a car over somebody's arm which remains unharmed.
|
Siamak Yari
Street magicians perform the well-known trick of driving a car over somebody's arm which remains unharmed.
|
Siamak Yari
Street magicians perform the well-known trick of driving a car over somebody's arm which remains unharmed.
image:46948:5::0
|
The publisher of this article was interviewed and he categorically stated that the reader failed to take not of the corresponding caption to these pictures. He mentioned that this was part of a Maareke giry or street magic act.
Considering that the writer did not take time off to do research on the above article, I would be sceptical as to what other lies are published in his blog/s. It amazes me that somebody can misconstrue something so innocent and yet lable it a religious practice without proof. I was also told once before by the same writer that the majority of the citizens of Sweden were atheist, hence their total good, moral lifestyle, only to find out that this was also a lie - 80% are Christian (hence their good, moral lifestyle).
Free speech should be proven and honest (unlike the above). According to the Quran (religious book), it encourages people to prove it wrong - which therefore allows freedom of speech, with proof. I am sure the Bible has something similar. Free speech has always been based on proof, however free speech that has been offensive and abusive in any form normally carries no proof.
One thing I have learnt is not to believe anything I read or hear until proven. People will slander religions, cultures, races, etc for their own hateful reasons. People must also remember that millions were killed by atheists (ie Stalin - 20 million, Mao - 23 million, Phol Pot - 3 million).
You are never going to get agreement and acceptance by any group which means free speech could potentially be detrimental to a normal society. The one thing we can count on is TRUTH.
I now dare the writer to apologise for the above as I am sure it would have offended many!!